....
Brazil has been asking for a sanctuary in the Atlantic ocean since 1998, but it has failed to gain 75% of the votes necessary to create a whaling-free zone in the South Atlantic Ocean. Pro-whaling nations oppose sanctuaries saying that they don't take into account scientific findings about growing whale populations.
In an age where we are losing an astounding number of species everywhere due to compounding environmental pressures and illegal hunting, I never thought that too many whales were ever going to be an issue. And who defines "subsistence" hunting or whaling? Aren't these renewed quotas and hunting policies pretty much laying out the red carpet for commercial scale poaching by non-indigenous groups? Who will monitor that only indigenous groups specified in the renewed policies, are those engaging in hunting and whaling? Who is going to assure that quotas are kept and catch limits are not exceeded? Who makes sure that the hunting and whaling is being used/will be used purely for cultural and subsistence reasons by indigenous communities who have persisted sustainably with these creatures, for generations. How strongly will surpassing the quota be dealt with?
Let's talk about subsistence. Polar bears are likely to become extinct in the next 25-50 years. Humpback whales have been on the endangered/threatened list, for as long as I can remember. What about the impending need to turn our attention to their subsistence?
image courtesy of Clean Water for All
No comments:
Post a Comment